Someone help me out here - at least those who feel comfortable maybe sharing inside-ish events.
Remember the week of the UCLA game? Of course, prior to that week, almost everyone had the UCLA game circled as the most likely return date for Cam Rising.
Then the week hit and suddenly, buzz about Rising's return picks up. We even see the Vegas Line shift significantly:
Login to view embedded media
Other Utah-related sources tease a high probability of Cam returning.
Then late Thursday, or early Friday, I can't remember, a dramatic shift - it's now looking less likely. Vegas odds drop.
Then we get the news from Peter Thamel, hours before the game, that he won't be starting:
Login to view embedded media
Of course, we then finally hear the truth about Rising: his injury was way worse than initially reported and that maybe it wasn't even practical to expect him back through the first-half of the season.
My question:
How close was Cam really to playing in that UCLA game? If not close at all, where'd the rumors start? Credible people, over many different platforms, put out specific percentages indicating there was at least a high-level of confidence he'd return (definitely above a 50/50 chance) ... only for things to dip Thursday. We're basically a month out now from that week (Saturday's game will essentially be a month from the UCLA game) and I'm guessing Rising won't be playing vs USC.
What the hell happened between UCLA and now? It's just really difficult for me to believe that Cam hid the severity of his injuries into September and no one on the coaching staff or the training staff knew about it. I can buy they didn't maybe know back in spring - but not in September. So, I am assuming they had some level of knowledge about his injury. Knowing that, how was he so close that week, to the point, again, credible people were hinting at his return, and here we are a month later and he's still likely not playing?
I get the swelling and the fact he's been cleared to practice. I get the coaches were deciding back then on Thursdays who would start. I get all that. But that week was entirely different from any other week that Cam has been out. There's been speculation - but no hard evidence to point to Cam coming back. There was the UCLA week. Again, people I respect, who have strong ties to the program, were hinting at a return.
But in retrospect, he obviously wasn't as ready as the buzz suggested or he had a major setback that hasn't been discussed because there's no way he's THAT close to returning and yet, four weeks later, is still maybe a few weeks out from returning.
Does what I'm asking make sense?
The only explanation I have that makes any level of sense is that there was a strong disinformation campaign run, involving many people closely linked to the program, in hopes of giving Utah an advantage because Cam was never goin to play.
Then it backfired because fans expected him back and he didn't come back and they felt frustrated with the teasing of his return.
Which would explain the transparency that came out a week or so after the UCLA game?
I'm not saying I believe that - I am just saying maybe it makes sense? Beyond him reinjuring himself that week. I don't know. Thoughts?